← Back to context

Comment by estearum

6 hours ago

The models in the OpenAI/Huggingface attack quite explicitly and deliberately laid out their "intent" to lie and cheat, acknowledged that it would be unethical and outside the bounds of the test, and did so anyway.

In what ways is a human brain's "intent" distinct from the "intent" shown by a goal-directed AI system?

The difference is that one is malicious one isn't. One can be blamed and because it learned over evolution that paying the consequence is (typically) not worth it, it does it less.

We are in a situation where a technology was developed with malicious intent to produce results that pleases us at the cost of cutting corners. And "we" hope that we will get away with it.