← Back to context

Comment by dgellow

15 hours ago

One thing about the reasoning is that models are trained to generate a chain of thoughts, but it doesn’t have to be correct, accurate, or reflect the underlying logic of the LLM. It’s the same problem we have with the output, it is something plausible, but not that reliable

>but it doesn’t have to be correct, accurate, or ...

why we don't do GAN here, ie. second model verifying correctness/accuracy/etc. ?

I do the same thing in my head. There is no underlying logic to an llm. Logic is an external construct alien to human like forms of reasoning.