← Back to context

Comment by mzmzmzm

10 hours ago

I think "able to" anthropomorphizes a little too much for a system that is "prone to" evade.

A human who does these actions is simply "prone to" doing them. The distinction matters not one iota.

“evade” itself is anthropomorphic enough! I don’t understand the complaining about this. Humans are social creatures and we understand anthropomorphic language on a deeper level than dry inapt technical language.

language itself is incredibly metaphorical. Imposing rigid constraints on how people want to naturally talk about the world is just silly and will never work, no matter how much you wish it did.