← Back to context Comment by Upvoter33 15 hours ago That is woefully naive. But even if so: aren’t you against it? 3 comments Upvoter33 Reply ericmay 14 hours ago It's not naive. In fact any comment to the contrary of what I wrote would be naive.Yes of course I'm against it. I'm against it when Donald Trump does it, and I'm also against it when my local government does it, or Nancy Pelosi does it. batshit_beaver 12 hours ago There is, however, a question of scale. ericmay 11 hours ago What is the question? We can obviously pursue multiple cases simultaneously and we can do so effectively.
ericmay 14 hours ago It's not naive. In fact any comment to the contrary of what I wrote would be naive.Yes of course I'm against it. I'm against it when Donald Trump does it, and I'm also against it when my local government does it, or Nancy Pelosi does it. batshit_beaver 12 hours ago There is, however, a question of scale. ericmay 11 hours ago What is the question? We can obviously pursue multiple cases simultaneously and we can do so effectively.
batshit_beaver 12 hours ago There is, however, a question of scale. ericmay 11 hours ago What is the question? We can obviously pursue multiple cases simultaneously and we can do so effectively.
ericmay 11 hours ago What is the question? We can obviously pursue multiple cases simultaneously and we can do so effectively.
It's not naive. In fact any comment to the contrary of what I wrote would be naive.
Yes of course I'm against it. I'm against it when Donald Trump does it, and I'm also against it when my local government does it, or Nancy Pelosi does it.
There is, however, a question of scale.
What is the question? We can obviously pursue multiple cases simultaneously and we can do so effectively.