← Back to context Comment by apefulsin 13 hours ago So DNS should be open to MITM attackers? 2 comments apefulsin Reply icedchai 10 hours ago Even with DNSSEC, it still is. Example: https://blog.cloudflare.com/de-tld-outage-dnssec/ digitalPhonix 4 hours ago Did you read the article? It's saying that DNSSEC as an implementation to prevent MITM is flawed; other solutions that protect against MITM are proposed.
icedchai 10 hours ago Even with DNSSEC, it still is. Example: https://blog.cloudflare.com/de-tld-outage-dnssec/
digitalPhonix 4 hours ago Did you read the article? It's saying that DNSSEC as an implementation to prevent MITM is flawed; other solutions that protect against MITM are proposed.
Even with DNSSEC, it still is. Example: https://blog.cloudflare.com/de-tld-outage-dnssec/
Did you read the article? It's saying that DNSSEC as an implementation to prevent MITM is flawed; other solutions that protect against MITM are proposed.