← Back to context Comment by chpatrick 10 hours ago About two month ago: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacobian_conjecture 5 comments chpatrick Reply traes 5 hours ago We have absolutely no idea if this was a brilliant breakthrough or not. They haven't released any explanation of how it was found. A problem being old and prestigious does not mean its solution is automatically a brilliant breakthrough. drivebyhooting 9 hours ago That’s just a counter example I can check by hand with almost zero background.Wiles’s proof will remain a mystery to me. thrance 10 hours ago Come on, you can't compare that with Wiles's proof. chpatrick 9 hours ago Still unsolved for 87 years. thrance 8 hours ago Meaningless on its own.
traes 5 hours ago We have absolutely no idea if this was a brilliant breakthrough or not. They haven't released any explanation of how it was found. A problem being old and prestigious does not mean its solution is automatically a brilliant breakthrough.
drivebyhooting 9 hours ago That’s just a counter example I can check by hand with almost zero background.Wiles’s proof will remain a mystery to me.
thrance 10 hours ago Come on, you can't compare that with Wiles's proof. chpatrick 9 hours ago Still unsolved for 87 years. thrance 8 hours ago Meaningless on its own.
We have absolutely no idea if this was a brilliant breakthrough or not. They haven't released any explanation of how it was found. A problem being old and prestigious does not mean its solution is automatically a brilliant breakthrough.
That’s just a counter example I can check by hand with almost zero background.
Wiles’s proof will remain a mystery to me.
Come on, you can't compare that with Wiles's proof.
Still unsolved for 87 years.
Meaningless on its own.