← Back to context Comment by chpatrick 13 hours ago About two month ago: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacobian_conjecture 5 comments chpatrick Reply traes 8 hours ago We have absolutely no idea if this was a brilliant breakthrough or not. They haven't released any explanation of how it was found. A problem being old and prestigious does not mean its solution is automatically a brilliant breakthrough. drivebyhooting 12 hours ago That’s just a counter example I can check by hand with almost zero background.Wiles’s proof will remain a mystery to me. thrance 13 hours ago Come on, you can't compare that with Wiles's proof. chpatrick 12 hours ago Still unsolved for 87 years. thrance 11 hours ago Meaningless on its own.
traes 8 hours ago We have absolutely no idea if this was a brilliant breakthrough or not. They haven't released any explanation of how it was found. A problem being old and prestigious does not mean its solution is automatically a brilliant breakthrough.
drivebyhooting 12 hours ago That’s just a counter example I can check by hand with almost zero background.Wiles’s proof will remain a mystery to me.
thrance 13 hours ago Come on, you can't compare that with Wiles's proof. chpatrick 12 hours ago Still unsolved for 87 years. thrance 11 hours ago Meaningless on its own.
We have absolutely no idea if this was a brilliant breakthrough or not. They haven't released any explanation of how it was found. A problem being old and prestigious does not mean its solution is automatically a brilliant breakthrough.
That’s just a counter example I can check by hand with almost zero background.
Wiles’s proof will remain a mystery to me.
Come on, you can't compare that with Wiles's proof.
Still unsolved for 87 years.
Meaningless on its own.