← Back to context

Comment by overtone1000

2 days ago

But would still be a copyright violation

I'm not a lawyer, but in my view copyright violations center around distribution, not necessarily the method by which a work is obtained

e.g. if someone is reciting a poem they wrote in a public park, and I make a recording of that recitation, I have not violated their copyright in doing so, however I might violate their copyright by reconstructing that poem and then distributing it

  • As in all cases it depends on jurisdiction. For example where I am performers have a right to not be recorded so you may in fact not make such recording, you didn’t not necessarily violate copyright but you violated related rights.

    And likewise if you distribute any sort of copy of the recording you made you are violating at least one if not more copyrights.

    • where I live, anything in public view is allowed to be filmed/recorded, which is how the news can record things on the street without getting a release from those that they filmed, and they certainly distribute those recordings

      2 replies →

  • Which is why torrenting is the dumbest way to do this, since every downloader is also an uploader. That is what gets torrenters locked up. It is possible to leach only, but its not the default mode, and if this guy was broadcasting his IP address, then he was seeding... distributing.

    • You expose your IP address even when not seeding, and I don't know if this person was seeding these torrents