← Back to context Comment by lmc 22 days ago Not sure what the downvotes are for, fwiw it was meant to be supportive of the parent poster 3 comments lmc Reply slfnflctd 22 days ago It's a bit orthogonal. User grey-area's main point was that the humans at OpenAI should bear more responsibility for this, not that swarms of semi-intelligent agents are the big danger to be concerned about. lmc 22 days ago Fair point, thanks. slfnflctd 22 days ago Quick addendum, do not take that as me saying multi-agent swarms of simpler bots are not a threat. They very well could be.
slfnflctd 22 days ago It's a bit orthogonal. User grey-area's main point was that the humans at OpenAI should bear more responsibility for this, not that swarms of semi-intelligent agents are the big danger to be concerned about. lmc 22 days ago Fair point, thanks. slfnflctd 22 days ago Quick addendum, do not take that as me saying multi-agent swarms of simpler bots are not a threat. They very well could be.
lmc 22 days ago Fair point, thanks. slfnflctd 22 days ago Quick addendum, do not take that as me saying multi-agent swarms of simpler bots are not a threat. They very well could be.
slfnflctd 22 days ago Quick addendum, do not take that as me saying multi-agent swarms of simpler bots are not a threat. They very well could be.
It's a bit orthogonal. User grey-area's main point was that the humans at OpenAI should bear more responsibility for this, not that swarms of semi-intelligent agents are the big danger to be concerned about.
Fair point, thanks.
Quick addendum, do not take that as me saying multi-agent swarms of simpler bots are not a threat. They very well could be.