Comment by staticman2

I remarked upon distribution in a comment above

> however I might violate their copyright by reconstructing that poem and then distributing it

My argument is that the recording itself is not a copyright violation, not that distributing such a recording couldn't be construed as one (however I disagree on principle with that being illegal as well, as it puts an undue burden on the exercise of free speech, which should include the ability to accurately and entirely recite what I had experienced in a public place).