← Back to context

Comment by dinfinity

1 day ago

It's not really a surprise that less ethical people on average are richer than ethical people. Sad, but logical: they more often choose selfishly and thus amass more money.

This is the correct direction of causation in this case, imho.

Is it? Wealth is used as a proxy for virtue, and has been for a long time. "Nobility" has two meanings, after all. Why the same word, if not the same root sentiment? Unless one definition was originally meant sarcastically.

  • Is it?

      Then Jesus said to his disciples, “Truly I tell you, it is hard for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of heaven.  [I]t is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God.”
    

    This guy is pretty influential in at least half the globe.

  • You're countering logic rooted in psychology and economics with etymology and linguistics?

    How does "ancient people consider the wealthy virtuous" cancel out "selfish people tend to make more money"?