Comment by soricus

I would answer why was a single model enough for this? The fact check provides a kind of explicit written list of what cannot be asserted. At the same time gatekeeper compares the text with this list. I would say this is not about taste or judgment it’s about comparing two documents. In addition some of the removed items are direct violations of this list like the post called the model "a top‑tier model" even though the fact check by the way explicitly prohibited presenting circulating benchmarks as established facts. As regarding the degradation to Sonnet and Haiku I don't have yet any data.