Comment by rhelz
12 hours ago
// why limit your article's impact //
Because...science? It's not science until it passes peer review.
I'm not advocating that everybody stops posting to arXiv, and I'm not saying you can't find good stuff there. I'm just saying, it's a vanity press, there is absolutely no guarantee of the paper's quality.
And being published by a famous professor from a prestigious university is also no guarantee. If we've learned anything from the non-reproducibility crisis, it is that a paper's origin story is no guarantee.
> It's not science until it passes peer review.
You mean Robert Maxwell's quasi-monopoly on scientific publications ?
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/jun/27/profitable-b...
Then again neither is peer review. Reproducing research is the only way to prove reproducibility and thereby lend credibility to the claims.