← Back to context Comment by SXX 7 hours ago Come on. It's not WikiLeaks. If they were targeted by FBI it would be down. 4 comments SXX Reply dakolli 7 hours ago What do you mean, I didnt make it up... Its detailed on the archive.today wikipedia page.The media barrons in the west have bribed the US government to pursue archive criminally on their behalf for helping people bypass paywalls.https://www.theverge.com/news/815691/fbi-subpoena-archive-is... bulder 5 hours ago That's great, how does that absolve the archive.today maintainer's bad faith activities, including creating a country-wall? DaSHacka 2 hours ago Because if he's being targeted by the feds, he obviously he doesn't want his private information being published by some guy who self-admittedly did it on a whim?Is this really that hard to understand? dakolli 2 hours ago Umm, every USA company blocks North Korea, Iran and often Cuba.One guy blocking a single country is not at all problematic.
dakolli 7 hours ago What do you mean, I didnt make it up... Its detailed on the archive.today wikipedia page.The media barrons in the west have bribed the US government to pursue archive criminally on their behalf for helping people bypass paywalls.https://www.theverge.com/news/815691/fbi-subpoena-archive-is... bulder 5 hours ago That's great, how does that absolve the archive.today maintainer's bad faith activities, including creating a country-wall? DaSHacka 2 hours ago Because if he's being targeted by the feds, he obviously he doesn't want his private information being published by some guy who self-admittedly did it on a whim?Is this really that hard to understand? dakolli 2 hours ago Umm, every USA company blocks North Korea, Iran and often Cuba.One guy blocking a single country is not at all problematic.
bulder 5 hours ago That's great, how does that absolve the archive.today maintainer's bad faith activities, including creating a country-wall? DaSHacka 2 hours ago Because if he's being targeted by the feds, he obviously he doesn't want his private information being published by some guy who self-admittedly did it on a whim?Is this really that hard to understand? dakolli 2 hours ago Umm, every USA company blocks North Korea, Iran and often Cuba.One guy blocking a single country is not at all problematic.
DaSHacka 2 hours ago Because if he's being targeted by the feds, he obviously he doesn't want his private information being published by some guy who self-admittedly did it on a whim?Is this really that hard to understand?
dakolli 2 hours ago Umm, every USA company blocks North Korea, Iran and often Cuba.One guy blocking a single country is not at all problematic.
What do you mean, I didnt make it up... Its detailed on the archive.today wikipedia page.
The media barrons in the west have bribed the US government to pursue archive criminally on their behalf for helping people bypass paywalls.
https://www.theverge.com/news/815691/fbi-subpoena-archive-is...
That's great, how does that absolve the archive.today maintainer's bad faith activities, including creating a country-wall?
Because if he's being targeted by the feds, he obviously he doesn't want his private information being published by some guy who self-admittedly did it on a whim?
Is this really that hard to understand?
Umm, every USA company blocks North Korea, Iran and often Cuba.
One guy blocking a single country is not at all problematic.