← Back to context

Comment by mnkyokyfrnd

10 days ago

Operation Cyclone is largely understood as one of the main reasons for the invasion of Afghanistan by Russia. So US again is to blame as much.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Cyclone

To blame as much as Russia, who actually invaded? No.

  • US invaded by proxy through arming and supporting Islamists to destabilise a fairly legitimate government because it was aligned with Russia.

    Think if Russia today arms an anti-democracy militia in Canada in order to destabilise USA. Any subsequent invasion of Canada by US would be a natural order of power play.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proxy_war

    • "Invaded by proxy" is not actually a thing. You're trying to make arming an insurgency sound equivalent to a full-on invasion, and they are not equivalent.

      The US did not arm the Islamists in order to destabilize Russia, just a Russian client. In response, Russia invaded and removed the client government - the very government that the Islamists were trying to remove.

      If Russia today armed an anti-democracy militia in Canada, would the US invade Canada? No (at least, any previous administration would not). We would share intel, help cut off the flow of arms, maybe even do a joint operation against the militia. But conquer Canada? Why would we do that?

      So your analogy is as flawed as your moral equivalence.

      1 reply →