← Back to context

Comment by bayarearefugee

8 hours ago

Well, sure, but on the other hand Peter Thiel thinks she might be the antichrist, and he has an awful lot of money which means he is an expert on everything.

He says she’s the Antichrist because she’s against progress and threatens the continued thriving of our civilization. Being antichrist is an archetype.

  • > she’s against progress and threatens the continued thriving of our civilization.

    How exactly does she threaten the continued thriving of our civilization?

    It is fine for people to disagree with her worldviews, but labeling her a threat to civilization is an absurd claim.

    A civilization that can be threatened by a single person's acts of peaceful protest might be doing something, but it sure isn't thriving.

    • She, as an individual, is not the literal threat. She's a prominent example of the archetype that does.

      It's symbolic.