← Back to context Comment by 0xDEAFBEAD 2 months ago We're talking about open-weight models.It only takes one. 3 comments 0xDEAFBEAD Reply nextlevelwizard 2 months ago And hardware to run it and coherence and knowledge to set it up. This feels like insane doomerism. 0xDEAFBEAD 2 months ago So it stops being insane as soon as... some person or organization offers the ablated open-weight model as a service? nextlevelwizard 1 month ago You are so wrong that it doesn't even feel right to call you wrong since you are in another universe with its own laws of physics looking into ours wrong.
nextlevelwizard 2 months ago And hardware to run it and coherence and knowledge to set it up. This feels like insane doomerism. 0xDEAFBEAD 2 months ago So it stops being insane as soon as... some person or organization offers the ablated open-weight model as a service? nextlevelwizard 1 month ago You are so wrong that it doesn't even feel right to call you wrong since you are in another universe with its own laws of physics looking into ours wrong.
0xDEAFBEAD 2 months ago So it stops being insane as soon as... some person or organization offers the ablated open-weight model as a service? nextlevelwizard 1 month ago You are so wrong that it doesn't even feel right to call you wrong since you are in another universe with its own laws of physics looking into ours wrong.
nextlevelwizard 1 month ago You are so wrong that it doesn't even feel right to call you wrong since you are in another universe with its own laws of physics looking into ours wrong.
And hardware to run it and coherence and knowledge to set it up. This feels like insane doomerism.
So it stops being insane as soon as... some person or organization offers the ablated open-weight model as a service?
You are so wrong that it doesn't even feel right to call you wrong since you are in another universe with its own laws of physics looking into ours wrong.