Comment by visarga
2 hours ago
Author might have spend days researching it, selecting what to include and what not to, revising the language and graphics, then comes Pangram and slaps 100% AI on it without looking into the substance.
2 hours ago
Author might have spend days researching it, selecting what to include and what not to, revising the language and graphics, then comes Pangram and slaps 100% AI on it without looking into the substance.
Unfortunately, given the sheer magnitude of text on the internet, we need heuristics to gauge whether something is worth reading or not. For authors/blogs that I don't yet know, LLM-generated text is a clear anti-signal for me, and Pangram has been very useful in that regard.
What false positive rate would you regard as still acceptable for your use case?