← Back to context Comment by orangecat 11 hours ago Which is not "theft" according to current legal precedent, and also common sense. 11 comments orangecat Reply haunter 8 hours ago Download a book and you are a thiefDownload 1 million books and you are OpenAI Squarex 5 hours ago What? HN has always praised Library Genesis for example. an0malous 41 minutes ago Libgen isn’t trying to sell you back the content for $100/month. No one would be complaining if OpenAI open sourced their models. 1 reply → matt3210 8 hours ago Hunting an animal would be considered ok by most, but scaling it to the point of damage is not ok according to most. ironman1478 10 hours ago It is theft under common sense. conz 8 hours ago Only in the sense that you reading a book from the library also constitutes theft of knowledge. Does it? 20k 8 hours ago If I stole someone's private research notes and republished them loosely in my own words, they'd correctly be pissedThis was unpublished research that was stolen, and constitutes plagiarism and academic fraud by even the strictest definition 3 replies →
haunter 8 hours ago Download a book and you are a thiefDownload 1 million books and you are OpenAI Squarex 5 hours ago What? HN has always praised Library Genesis for example. an0malous 41 minutes ago Libgen isn’t trying to sell you back the content for $100/month. No one would be complaining if OpenAI open sourced their models. 1 reply →
Squarex 5 hours ago What? HN has always praised Library Genesis for example. an0malous 41 minutes ago Libgen isn’t trying to sell you back the content for $100/month. No one would be complaining if OpenAI open sourced their models. 1 reply →
an0malous 41 minutes ago Libgen isn’t trying to sell you back the content for $100/month. No one would be complaining if OpenAI open sourced their models. 1 reply →
matt3210 8 hours ago Hunting an animal would be considered ok by most, but scaling it to the point of damage is not ok according to most.
ironman1478 10 hours ago It is theft under common sense. conz 8 hours ago Only in the sense that you reading a book from the library also constitutes theft of knowledge. Does it? 20k 8 hours ago If I stole someone's private research notes and republished them loosely in my own words, they'd correctly be pissedThis was unpublished research that was stolen, and constitutes plagiarism and academic fraud by even the strictest definition 3 replies →
conz 8 hours ago Only in the sense that you reading a book from the library also constitutes theft of knowledge. Does it? 20k 8 hours ago If I stole someone's private research notes and republished them loosely in my own words, they'd correctly be pissedThis was unpublished research that was stolen, and constitutes plagiarism and academic fraud by even the strictest definition 3 replies →
20k 8 hours ago If I stole someone's private research notes and republished them loosely in my own words, they'd correctly be pissedThis was unpublished research that was stolen, and constitutes plagiarism and academic fraud by even the strictest definition 3 replies →
Download a book and you are a thief
Download 1 million books and you are OpenAI
What? HN has always praised Library Genesis for example.
Libgen isn’t trying to sell you back the content for $100/month. No one would be complaining if OpenAI open sourced their models.
1 reply →
Hunting an animal would be considered ok by most, but scaling it to the point of damage is not ok according to most.
It is theft under common sense.
Only in the sense that you reading a book from the library also constitutes theft of knowledge. Does it?
If I stole someone's private research notes and republished them loosely in my own words, they'd correctly be pissed
This was unpublished research that was stolen, and constitutes plagiarism and academic fraud by even the strictest definition
3 replies →