← Back to context

Comment by ShinyLeftPad

8 hours ago

> Compared to, say, a large language model that writes news or fiction... an autonomous-driving AI is less subjective and easier to evaluate, so there’s little room for error.

That's brave. What about all the edge cases?

They're talking about verification. Was there a collision or not compared to is this story good.

  • I can think of scenarios that avoid collision in probably 95% of the cases while being bad choices

    - Driving through an empty prairie

    - Driving slowly through a crowded square, giving people enough time to jump out of the way

    • There's less gray area with driving wss the point. Legal or illegal, efficient or inefficient. And whatever gray area remains is generally "good enough" compared to human drivers on the road.

      1 reply →