← Back to context Comment by nbhkvl 20 hours ago [flagged] 4 comments nbhkvl Reply mdeeks 20 hours ago He doesn't seem to be a marking guy. Also you haven't given a reason not to take his words seriously fn-mote 13 hours ago You must not be reading the Navier-Stokes threads. Marketing, damage control, PR department or engineer it doesn’t matter. swat535 10 hours ago You don’t think employees with an incentive to profit financially by imposing government regulations on competition should be questioned? 123jas 20 hours ago Too much pushback, so the AI people flagged this submission to the third page in minutes.Like Kabuki theater.
mdeeks 20 hours ago He doesn't seem to be a marking guy. Also you haven't given a reason not to take his words seriously fn-mote 13 hours ago You must not be reading the Navier-Stokes threads. Marketing, damage control, PR department or engineer it doesn’t matter. swat535 10 hours ago You don’t think employees with an incentive to profit financially by imposing government regulations on competition should be questioned?
fn-mote 13 hours ago You must not be reading the Navier-Stokes threads. Marketing, damage control, PR department or engineer it doesn’t matter.
swat535 10 hours ago You don’t think employees with an incentive to profit financially by imposing government regulations on competition should be questioned?
123jas 20 hours ago Too much pushback, so the AI people flagged this submission to the third page in minutes.Like Kabuki theater.
He doesn't seem to be a marking guy. Also you haven't given a reason not to take his words seriously
You must not be reading the Navier-Stokes threads. Marketing, damage control, PR department or engineer it doesn’t matter.
You don’t think employees with an incentive to profit financially by imposing government regulations on competition should be questioned?
Too much pushback, so the AI people flagged this submission to the third page in minutes.
Like Kabuki theater.