← Back to context

Comment by mofeien

2 days ago

China has stricter regulations on models than the US. For example you can't release a model if the hallucination rate is above a certain threshold.

The US hasn't fully woken up to the fact yet that the race to superintelligence is a death race. China (population, members of the government, academics, lab employees) could also just not have fully grasped it yet. I'm personally confident that it will be possible to explain it to them.

> China has stricter regulations on models than the US. For example you can't release a model if the hallucination rate is above a certain threshold.

I wasn't aware of that, so I checked - and indeed, there are some firm regulations there, just not exactly the one you're describing:

- a new generative AI must pass a security assessment and be filed with the "Cyberspace Administration of China" before launch, tested against GB/T 45654-2025, which has hard numeric thresholds:

training corpus ≥96% compliant on manual inspection (≥98% technical), sources with >5% illegal/harmful content can't be collected at all, generated content ≥90% pass rate, ≥95% refusal on questions that must be refused, ≤5% false refusals.

The moment in which hallucination factors into this hard 90% threshold is Risk A.5.a ("inaccurate content grossly inconsistent with scientific knowledge"). The standard explicitly states however, that this risk applies when the model is used for specific service types with higher safety requirements, such as critical information infrastructure, automatic control, medical information services, psychological counseling, and financial information services. Everywhere else, accuracy is a best-effort obligation.

source: https://cset.georgetown.edu/publication/china-gen-ai-safety-...