← Back to context

Comment by gfody

1 day ago

> has no moat

I would love to see someone try to escape with a copy of openai's raw unaligned base model

There is no need for a copy. If another can do most of what OpenAI/Anthropic can do at a fraction of the cost (like the Chinese models) then the moat evaporates.

  • the capability gap is underestimated. the raw unaligned base model from a pretrain is like the telemetry recorded from a particle accelerator - it's hugely valuable and not just because of the cost sunk building a collider.

    the things are kept under air-gapped national weapons grade security measures not because it's literally going to escape and threaten the world but because if somebody walked out the door with a copy they would have everything. the capabilities we see at the surface are mostly the result of mining the great unknown space and attaching feeble control surfaces, ablating/lobotomizing dangerous areas, and fencing off illegal/secret/embarrassing ones.

    • > the capability gap is underestimated.

      Based off what? There’s pretty precise measurements of the capability gap where open weight models like Kimi K3 score higher than the latest flagship models just 6 months ago.

    • > the capability gap is underestimated.

      The capability gap is in the minds of the users but the frontiers' closed business models run opposite to it.

      > the things are kept under air-gapped national weapons grade security measures

      That's an enhancement of closed but not of moat

      > because if somebody walked out the door with a copy they would have everything.

      Including you and me? I'm not sure this is comforting news, despite the "trust me bro" asurances from behind the door where we can't see or verify anything.

      2 replies →

I expect they are slowing down in an attempt to keep from having those models improve to the point where they can effectively escape unassisted into the wild.