← Back to context

Comment by pazimzadeh

10 hours ago

Correct me if I'm wrong, but Hezbollah was created after Israel invaded Lebanon in 1978, and Hezbollah was not involved in 9/11.

By your logic, shouldn't we be enemies with Saudi Arabia and Israel, who have incubated and funded terrorists for much longer than Iran (80 years in the case of Israel)?

'Terror was justified' to establish Israel, Reuter, September 6, 1991

https://www.caymancompass.com/1991/09/06/terror-was-justifie...

Here is the comment you just deleted:

  Of course Saudis have their finger in it too, including pushing radical Wahhabism Islamism that also inspired Osama. Which is also currently one of the major reasons UAE/MBZ is in a proxy fight with Saudis because they think Saudi's continued support of Islamists destabilizes the region (which is true).

  US-wise, geopolitics aren't as simple there, since Saudi was always a way less blatant offender than Iran and Iran/Saudi both were left untouched because of their oil power. There's a reason neither Bush nor Obama attacked Iran despite having plenty of good reasons. Trump and Israel apparently saw an opportunity to finally take on Iran. But it was always extremely risky, as we've seen... Likewise it would be risky trying to interfere in Saudi politics, especially when they serve as a counterweight to Iran and their proxies. Enemy of my enemy etc. Same deal with Israel..Israel is a complex issue which I'd rather not get into right now.

I'm curious why you'd rather not get into it about Israel. Do you not think Iran is a complex issue?

  • I deleted my comment because I read some your own comment edits after I posted my reply and decided I don’t want to engage with this sort of thing on HN.

    I see you’ve tried to make it less incendiary in further edits but it’s obvious what you’re aiming for. I find that conversation boring and overly social media brained.

    • What was incendiary? All I did was remove some quotes from the article that I already linked. I decided to see what you would reply to the first message first.

      Curious why you won't engage about Israel, now you're doing ad hominem attacks.

      You didn't even really engage with the points I made in my initial comment.

      1 reply →