← Back to context

Comment by t0bia_s

8 hours ago

Every time Fairphone release new device I check width size. Still waiting for small device.

I wonder if Meta pays phone manufacturers under the table to keep their size large

  • The overwhelming majority of consumers just prefer larger screens (myself included). People seem to forget that Apple releasing the Mini was them listening to the minority and the sales numbers if it were poor versus the rest of the lineup.

    And why would Meta even do that?

    • The follow-up strategy of “smaller width and height didn’t work, let’s try thickness next” reportedly not going any better.

      I really think COVID shutdowns did the mini in. People couldn’t go to the store and try holding a phone where they could use it comfortably one-handed again. And then by the time they could, Apple axed it.

      1 reply →

    • > the sales numbers if it were poor versus the rest of the lineup.

      For one, the sales were still perfectly respectable. "Versus the rest of the lineup" is doing a ton of work here, because the rest of the iPhone models sell like crazy. For two, it is still bizarre that manufacturers refuse to make small phones even with that in mind. If you wear very small clothes (or very large clothes) that won't sell as many units, your options are limited, you have to pay more, but you aren't forced to go naked. But there's nobody out there doing the equivalent strategy for phones.

      6 replies →