← Back to context

Comment by Aurornis

11 hours ago

> Sure - look at what is being done today with H1B visas and tariffs.

I have some bad news for you if you bought into the idea that the tariffs were good for domestic jobs and the economy.

> What is more important to you - having a job and a functioning economy/society, or upholding some "free market" doctrine you've bought into?

This is the definition of a false dichotomy, and you also ignored (or missed) the point completely.

I did not make an argument out of “free market doctrine”. I explained the second order effects that would provide a net reduction in jobs in this country.

My wife’s company is going through this right now. H1Bs are expensive and unpredictable, so the solution is to relocate more of the operations outside of the country and build up those offices.

Failure to understand second order effects and international economies is pervasive in these arguments for heavy regulations. You can do a lot to hold back your country’s companies to force them to pay for employees they don’t need and those few employees benefit for a while, but it collapses when those companies stop hiring in the regulated countries and resume hiring where they can actually operate a business. If you try to regulate them from doing it anywhere, you’ve given their competitors a wonderful gift to come destroy the company completely. Then they’re not making any jobs for anyone.

free market doctrine is an axiom to your second order effects. its so embedded into all your assumptions that you havent even considered it

  • Whatever you are calling "free market doctrine" is a physical law. Why would a business owner subject themselves to shitty conditions if they could find workers in better places? Some would of course, but not most or all.

Do you think outsourcing and offshoring of jobs, whether manufacturing or software development, has been a positive for the US economy?

Does it make sense to you for US companies to be sending wages overseas, supporting a foreign family and economy, when there is someone here in the US, unemployed and equally capable of doing the job?

Trump has certainly been ham-fisted about tariffs, but in a world without tariffs then the country with lowest cost of production, closely related to lowest cost of living, and lowest wages, wins, and this is not going to be the US in most cases. If you follow that path then a high cost country like the US will end up utterly reliant on other countries as it imports almost everything, and loses all domestic manufacturing capability. Sounds familiar?