← Back to context

Comment by Polizeiposaune

12 hours ago

a .tesla.com certificate might well enable more shenanigans than a .pool.ntp.org cert.

That points to a glaring hole in the modern-day automated web PKI, not Tesla's dangling DNS record.

Hell, they issue certificates to IP addresses now. For cloud systems, ownership of an IP could be a few hours.

This has almost certainly been deemed an acceptable risk.

  • > That points to a glaring hole in the modern-day automated web PKI, not Tesla's dangling DNS record.

    It's not. They control a long-term high-value asset (the domain tesla.com). They decided to delegate part of that asset to a large number of "random" people that they do not have a contract or agreement with.

    Being able to issue certs for cloud IPs has nothing to do with this since it is not a long term asset, and if it is you probably don't delegate it to random people to control unless you do not value that asset.

  • This is why IP certificates are limited to a max lifetime of 6 days.

    > IP address certificates allow server operators to authenticate TLS connections to IP addresses rather than domain names. Let’s Encrypt supports both IPv4 and IPv6. IP address certificates must be short-lived certificates, a decision we made because IP addresses are more transient than domain names, so validating more frequently is important.

    https://letsencrypt.org/2026/01/15/6day-and-ip-general-avail...