← Back to context

Comment by hn_submit

24 days ago

I agree that the choice for JPEG XL is mostly politically motivated: it isn't Google. And its name is derived from JPEG, which is an IETF standard which gives it more clout.

6 comments

hn_submit

Reply
charcircuit  24 days ago

>it isn't Google.

It is Google. The JPEG XL standard evolved from a codec Google made, Google was involved in the standardization process, and Google heavily contributed to the reference implementation of JPEG XL.

https://ds.jpeg.org/whitepapers/jpeg-xl-whitepaper.pdf

  Editors:
  Jyrki Alakuijala – Google, Switzerland
  Jon Sneyers – Cloudinary, Belgium
  Luca Versari – Google, Switzerland
  Jan Wassenberg – Google, Switzerland

  • hn_submit  24 days ago

    Yes, but unlike WebP it wasn't exclusively designed and developed by Google. That's a big difference.

    • mimasama  24 days ago

      AV1 wasn't also exclusively designed and developed by Google.

      Chrome's team should be blamed for favoring AVIF over JPEG-XL, not Google entirely.

  • jbverschoor  24 days ago

    And Google also removed jxl support in Chrome in '22 (only to put it back in recently)

    • jaffathecake  24 days ago

      It was only ever supported behind a flag. Stuff behind a flag isn't 'supported', it's experimental. The experiment ended.