← Back to context Comment by chinathrow 1 day ago Context? 3 comments chinathrow Reply ale42 21 hours ago Some people believe that there's the CIA is behind Signal. sire-vc 20 hours ago The CIA certainly uses Signal, which is why privacy advocates who think the US government will go after it are idiots. Same thing for Tor. sm-silversight 19 hours ago I'm being cheeky and implying that the reason signal's active backend is not disclosed as hoped for in a prior poster's comment is because the CIA (or other intelligence) is involved in it.
ale42 21 hours ago Some people believe that there's the CIA is behind Signal. sire-vc 20 hours ago The CIA certainly uses Signal, which is why privacy advocates who think the US government will go after it are idiots. Same thing for Tor.
sire-vc 20 hours ago The CIA certainly uses Signal, which is why privacy advocates who think the US government will go after it are idiots. Same thing for Tor.
sm-silversight 19 hours ago I'm being cheeky and implying that the reason signal's active backend is not disclosed as hoped for in a prior poster's comment is because the CIA (or other intelligence) is involved in it.
Some people believe that there's the CIA is behind Signal.
The CIA certainly uses Signal, which is why privacy advocates who think the US government will go after it are idiots. Same thing for Tor.
I'm being cheeky and implying that the reason signal's active backend is not disclosed as hoped for in a prior poster's comment is because the CIA (or other intelligence) is involved in it.