← Back to context Comment by simondotau 11 hours ago Maybe if people didn't make services like XCancel, the impracticality of X would be more salient. 3 comments simondotau Reply mitxela 11 hours ago It isn't. We know this because there was a time before xcancel and people just accepted they needed an account.It can happen - nobody would post an Instagram link to HN. But for X it did not happen.Notice the EU's Digital Markets Act is a liability shield for Nitter instances hosted in the EU. nativeit 8 hours ago That assumes the people who need XCancel most are aware of its existence, but from what I can tell only folks like us are. roryirvine 10 hours ago [dead]
mitxela 11 hours ago It isn't. We know this because there was a time before xcancel and people just accepted they needed an account.It can happen - nobody would post an Instagram link to HN. But for X it did not happen.Notice the EU's Digital Markets Act is a liability shield for Nitter instances hosted in the EU. nativeit 8 hours ago That assumes the people who need XCancel most are aware of its existence, but from what I can tell only folks like us are. roryirvine 10 hours ago [dead]
nativeit 8 hours ago That assumes the people who need XCancel most are aware of its existence, but from what I can tell only folks like us are.
It isn't. We know this because there was a time before xcancel and people just accepted they needed an account.
It can happen - nobody would post an Instagram link to HN. But for X it did not happen.
Notice the EU's Digital Markets Act is a liability shield for Nitter instances hosted in the EU.
That assumes the people who need XCancel most are aware of its existence, but from what I can tell only folks like us are.
[dead]