← Back to context Comment by bonsai_spool 8 hours ago > Precedent is pretty clear:What cases are you citing when you say this? 7 comments bonsai_spool Reply brainwad 8 hours ago Bartz v Anthropic. Though the plaintiffs did get something, it was because of the piracy to the original works (competing against the legal market for the books), not the use of them to train the LLM. lesuorac 7 hours ago Bartz is an author though.Is X claiming ownership of the posts people make because pretty much every single social media site doesn't so they have section 230 protection. brainwad 7 hours ago They can just round up some friendly users and sue under their names. Starting with their own corporate accounts? 2 replies → immibis2 8 hours ago Perhaps https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warner_Bros._Entertainment_Inc....
brainwad 8 hours ago Bartz v Anthropic. Though the plaintiffs did get something, it was because of the piracy to the original works (competing against the legal market for the books), not the use of them to train the LLM. lesuorac 7 hours ago Bartz is an author though.Is X claiming ownership of the posts people make because pretty much every single social media site doesn't so they have section 230 protection. brainwad 7 hours ago They can just round up some friendly users and sue under their names. Starting with their own corporate accounts? 2 replies →
lesuorac 7 hours ago Bartz is an author though.Is X claiming ownership of the posts people make because pretty much every single social media site doesn't so they have section 230 protection. brainwad 7 hours ago They can just round up some friendly users and sue under their names. Starting with their own corporate accounts? 2 replies →
brainwad 7 hours ago They can just round up some friendly users and sue under their names. Starting with their own corporate accounts? 2 replies →
Bartz v Anthropic. Though the plaintiffs did get something, it was because of the piracy to the original works (competing against the legal market for the books), not the use of them to train the LLM.
Bartz is an author though.
Is X claiming ownership of the posts people make because pretty much every single social media site doesn't so they have section 230 protection.
They can just round up some friendly users and sue under their names. Starting with their own corporate accounts?
2 replies →
Perhaps https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warner_Bros._Entertainment_Inc....