Comment by stronglikedan
5 hours ago
There have been news stories where individual OpenAI users have been investigated based on their prompts. If OpenAI can point the police to specific users of their software, they can certainly point them to whichever of their own employees are involved in a crime. AI is just a tool, and the person prompting it is the one responsible for the outcome. No dilution there.
What is its one their "under development" models who escaped it's training, because it wasn't tuned properly?
That’s corporate negligence. The executives are liable unless there is evidence of malfeasance by one of the employees.
Counter argument being that this seems to indicate you can do whatever as long as you're innovating?
[dead]