← Back to context

Comment by nkozyra

3 hours ago

Effectively it forces scrapers to become a party to the terms of service, which usually contains the "no programmatic access (other than via paid API)" or specifically prohibits automated scraping.

Breaking terms of service isn't a crime, at least, although the company is legally permitted to retaliate against it, such as by banning you.

How can an automated process be a party in the terms of services though?

  • > How can an automated process be a party in the terms of services though?

    If it's auth-gated, it needs to be, well, authenticated.

    The person who provides that, and the subsequent automated scraping, is the party, and would be the recipient of a civil suit.

    • > If it's auth-gated, it needs to be, well, authenticated.

      AFAIK, there isn't an single auth scheme on earth that guarantee human intervention[1]. Anyone can set-up a robot creating new users on a whim using single-use email addresses and even phone numbers. In fact, we know that OpenAI's agent have been doing exactly that when attacking Rubygem. And all AI labs are likely doing it for scrapping social media as well.

      Who are you gonna sue then?

      [1] the closest thing is Altman iris scanning venture, but without a broad adoption it's remains functionally useless.

      5 replies →