Comment by pessimizer

This doesn't even make logical sense. Actual judges have highly correlated outputs. This would literally be actively sculpting the range of opinions you want to see.

It's like the idea of political districting that thinks that the aim should be to balance each district between "the two" political parties. You're not doing anything but institutionalizing two political parties and constant conflict. You're setting the range of acceptable opinions, then choosing at random between them. Even more relevantly: when both institutionalized parties have the same opinion, it's considered the correct opinion no matter how much or how little public support it has.