← Back to context Comment by nicwilson 8 hours ago Well yeah, but then you are using code generation, not writing code directly. 3 comments nicwilson Reply oblio 5 hours ago I meant LLMs :-) high_na_euv 3 hours ago You are trying to say that llm can replace compiler? oblio 18 minutes ago In general, no? But they should help with this part:> Launching kernels manually is an error prone PITA which I believe is the principle reason for CUDA's popularity.
oblio 5 hours ago I meant LLMs :-) high_na_euv 3 hours ago You are trying to say that llm can replace compiler? oblio 18 minutes ago In general, no? But they should help with this part:> Launching kernels manually is an error prone PITA which I believe is the principle reason for CUDA's popularity.
high_na_euv 3 hours ago You are trying to say that llm can replace compiler? oblio 18 minutes ago In general, no? But they should help with this part:> Launching kernels manually is an error prone PITA which I believe is the principle reason for CUDA's popularity.
oblio 18 minutes ago In general, no? But they should help with this part:> Launching kernels manually is an error prone PITA which I believe is the principle reason for CUDA's popularity.
I meant LLMs :-)
You are trying to say that llm can replace compiler?
In general, no? But they should help with this part:
> Launching kernels manually is an error prone PITA which I believe is the principle reason for CUDA's popularity.