← Back to context

Comment by krageon

1 month ago

You've made a hypothesis, provided no basis for it, blew past that and built some more conclusions on top of it. Along the way you introduced a few more unsubstantiated thoughts.

The post in it's entirety reads as a religious rant, but it might have had something to offer to the reader if you had bothered to provide some sort of philosophical foundation for why you feel that the middle way is the superior way. And that all excess is inherently not only nearly identical in terms of effect, but by definition harmful.

There's basically zero content to your reply so I'm ignoring it.

  • It gave you feedback on why you are being down voted and actionable advice. You are free to ignore whatever you read online, but it is disingenuous to say there is no content.