← Back to context

Comment by LtWorf

3 hours ago

On Debian we recently voted whether to permit or forbid llm usage (spoiler, AI usage at will won).

One person was arguing that they need llm because english isn't their first language and then it helps them write better and be understood. I was incapable of reading their (extremely long) email of arguments; I tried but my mind just went elsewhere as my eyes were moving through the lines.

At the very end there was a disclaimer that llm had been used to "aid" in writing that very email.

Poor guy thinks he's communicating better but all he's doing is making his emails completely unreadable. It's a sad state of affairs.

It kind of makes sense that if English is not their first language, the can't review the LLM English output also.

However most likely they just don't understand what good communication looks like, LLMs are perfectly capable of turning anything into clear concise communication, in fact an easy tell that something is LLM written is that it's just too precise and clear, humans are much more rambling.

There is now increased evolutionary pressure for rules protecting scarcity to become norm. Communication media will likely adopt limits on the size and throughput of messages.