← Back to context

Comment by xnx

15 hours ago

Yes, but a popular one that's usable by regular people and with a very wealthy organization behind it.

How do you expect things to be popular without a company with self-interest? Producing a linux phone that people want requires immense capital, they're not just spending that and then releasing as open source forever.

By the time the product becomes "popular", it's then just one more platform that needs to follow investor interest and laws.

  • Valve is kinda doing that with SteamOS ? It's primarily made for their own hardware, but they also use work time to add features for installs on non valve hardware, and all of their components are open source.

Why GNU? I get the appeal of Linux, but Android has that angle covered. What makes GNU a better userspace than Android for phone use? I actually think the Andoid userspace is very good for what it is. If Google's influence were magically removed, Android would be more or less the ideal OS, at least for me.

This can be achieved if more people support the effort. If you expect megacorps to offer you a device respecting your freedom, think again.

I miss my blackberry

  • It's not the same, it does not run BBOS10, and de-Googled LineageOS will have to do for now (for me).

    But at least we can get updated internals for the Q20 (and soon the Passport). It'll be the closest we can get to carrying a BlackBerry for some time, if ever, and I'm happy enough with mine that I picked up a spare mainboard

    https://zinwa.com/