← Back to context Comment by WalterBright 6 hours ago The article doesn't mention subscription revenue. I subscribed to X in order to not see ads. 1 comment WalterBright Reply somenameforme 3 hours ago It also doesn't factor in the dramatically reduced costs. It's likely that X is already significantly more profitable than Twitter was. And with less dependency on advertisers, which is a huge win in and of itself.
somenameforme 3 hours ago It also doesn't factor in the dramatically reduced costs. It's likely that X is already significantly more profitable than Twitter was. And with less dependency on advertisers, which is a huge win in and of itself.
It also doesn't factor in the dramatically reduced costs. It's likely that X is already significantly more profitable than Twitter was. And with less dependency on advertisers, which is a huge win in and of itself.