← Back to context Comment by msy 4 days ago Isn't this just a brute forcing exercise of a (in today's terms) very small key then? 10 comments msy Reply xeromal 4 days ago It's doing something that wasn't worth the squeeze for a human. Seems like a perfect use case for AI. Sure, I can do X or I can do Y but if it takes me a few weeks but AI can hash it out in hours, it now makes it worth it. red75prime 4 days ago Can we stop using "brute force" for designating "tour de force"? rrr_oh_man 4 days ago https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brute-force_attack red75prime 4 days ago I'm aware. Locating a single probable key is exactly not that. 6 replies →
xeromal 4 days ago It's doing something that wasn't worth the squeeze for a human. Seems like a perfect use case for AI. Sure, I can do X or I can do Y but if it takes me a few weeks but AI can hash it out in hours, it now makes it worth it.
red75prime 4 days ago Can we stop using "brute force" for designating "tour de force"? rrr_oh_man 4 days ago https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brute-force_attack red75prime 4 days ago I'm aware. Locating a single probable key is exactly not that. 6 replies →
rrr_oh_man 4 days ago https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brute-force_attack red75prime 4 days ago I'm aware. Locating a single probable key is exactly not that. 6 replies →
It's doing something that wasn't worth the squeeze for a human. Seems like a perfect use case for AI. Sure, I can do X or I can do Y but if it takes me a few weeks but AI can hash it out in hours, it now makes it worth it.
Can we stop using "brute force" for designating "tour de force"?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brute-force_attack
I'm aware. Locating a single probable key is exactly not that.
6 replies →