← Back to context Comment by raincole 1 day ago Yeah because... AI is a tool, not an artist. In other words water is wet. 2 comments raincole Reply kalleboo 21 hours ago The reason it isn't obvious is because the tool is marketed as replacing the artists, and that's how people are using it.Also what the author of this post did could easily be added to the training/harness/skills of ChatGPT in a future version. MichaelZuo 21 hours ago Of course they have ulterior motives to push the message that it can replace high quality human artists, even though that would be ridiculous under any serious analysis.That doesnt mean you have to believe them.
kalleboo 21 hours ago The reason it isn't obvious is because the tool is marketed as replacing the artists, and that's how people are using it.Also what the author of this post did could easily be added to the training/harness/skills of ChatGPT in a future version. MichaelZuo 21 hours ago Of course they have ulterior motives to push the message that it can replace high quality human artists, even though that would be ridiculous under any serious analysis.That doesnt mean you have to believe them.
MichaelZuo 21 hours ago Of course they have ulterior motives to push the message that it can replace high quality human artists, even though that would be ridiculous under any serious analysis.That doesnt mean you have to believe them.
The reason it isn't obvious is because the tool is marketed as replacing the artists, and that's how people are using it.
Also what the author of this post did could easily be added to the training/harness/skills of ChatGPT in a future version.
Of course they have ulterior motives to push the message that it can replace high quality human artists, even though that would be ridiculous under any serious analysis.
That doesnt mean you have to believe them.