← Back to context Comment by mbrameld 20 hours ago How do you know that? 3 comments mbrameld Reply basilikum 19 hours ago I trust Pangram's stats to be a good baseline. alienbaby 16 hours ago Hey Claude, re word this until it passes pangram as not AI written. basilikum 14 hours ago As I explained in another comment the false negative rate is irrelevant in this context.
basilikum 19 hours ago I trust Pangram's stats to be a good baseline. alienbaby 16 hours ago Hey Claude, re word this until it passes pangram as not AI written. basilikum 14 hours ago As I explained in another comment the false negative rate is irrelevant in this context.
alienbaby 16 hours ago Hey Claude, re word this until it passes pangram as not AI written. basilikum 14 hours ago As I explained in another comment the false negative rate is irrelevant in this context.
basilikum 14 hours ago As I explained in another comment the false negative rate is irrelevant in this context.
I trust Pangram's stats to be a good baseline.
Hey Claude, re word this until it passes pangram as not AI written.
As I explained in another comment the false negative rate is irrelevant in this context.