← Back to context Comment by mbrameld 1 day ago How do you know that? 3 comments mbrameld Reply basilikum 1 day ago I trust Pangram's stats to be a good baseline. alienbaby 18 hours ago Hey Claude, re word this until it passes pangram as not AI written. basilikum 17 hours ago As I explained in another comment the false negative rate is irrelevant in this context.
basilikum 1 day ago I trust Pangram's stats to be a good baseline. alienbaby 18 hours ago Hey Claude, re word this until it passes pangram as not AI written. basilikum 17 hours ago As I explained in another comment the false negative rate is irrelevant in this context.
alienbaby 18 hours ago Hey Claude, re word this until it passes pangram as not AI written. basilikum 17 hours ago As I explained in another comment the false negative rate is irrelevant in this context.
basilikum 17 hours ago As I explained in another comment the false negative rate is irrelevant in this context.
I trust Pangram's stats to be a good baseline.
Hey Claude, re word this until it passes pangram as not AI written.
As I explained in another comment the false negative rate is irrelevant in this context.