← Back to context

Comment by koverstreet

17 hours ago

It really does.

But you might want to check out the bus factor on btrfs too; when a maintainer says "but we've saved Facebook billions and billions of dollars!", calls for the other filesystem maintainer to be ejected from the community, then quits to join Anthropic a month later - that's not a vote of confidence.

I'd be very happy if people could just stop bringing up drama and us factors. We put it behind us a year ago, but it seems not everyone got the memo.

Checking the bus factor:

Btrfs regulars:

- 1 from Meta

- 1 from Oracle

- 4 from SuSe

- 2 from WDC

bcachefs:

- Kent Overstreet

  • And Btrfs still does not have a RAID-5/6 that they themselves recommend for usage:

    * https://btrfs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/btrfs-man5.html#man-b...

    What have they been doing for the last decade(+)?

    • Other things: since no companies sponsoring its development had any interest in raid 5/6, which is mostly a home enthusiast thing.

      Western Digital picked up this work last year and is slowly getting through the new design without the write hole, I think we'll see working raid 5/6 in the next year or two.

  • Might end in a new bcachefs fork beeing included back into mainline. If companies sponsor a few fulltime devs working on the new fork, we finally might have a stable enterprise ready CoW filesystem.