← Back to context

Comment by johnnyanmac

17 hours ago

>could be a utopia where everyone lives in comfort and has more leisure time.

It definitely could be. With current trajectory as of now, do you think it will be?

>except that generally instead of realising we all have enough of we share, we raise the threshold of what we consider to be enough comfort and stuff.

I see the opposite sentiment. I see previous basic necessities further out or reach then they were last generation. People aren't raising their standards, they are sinking towards poverty.

But then their worries are dismissed because they can get a flatscreen TV for 200 dollars. A TV that is likely feeding your data back to corporate to make thousands off you.

You're going back one generation, and I'm thinking further back.

Like, if we all settled for a 1950s British living standard, using current manufacturing technology, we could achieve that while everyone works a little bit less.

But, we'd prefer to keep labouring and have nicer things.

  • The supposed goal of "Make America Great again" is to invoke that 50s era of American exceptionalism. So surely there's something there people miss.

    And your theoretical implies we have choice in the matter. I'm sure many would in fact take a smaller home with less amenities over a modern home with cheap appliances. Not that I'd actually be given that choice given my family lineage, but the general living standard of the 50's was quite high. I doubt the act of AC and the lack of knowledge of abestos are the things that made housing skyrocket over the decades.