← Back to context

Comment by abletonlive

7 hours ago

> So given that, which one of these is true about you?

Well, if those are the only two options you can come up with it's pretty clear that this isn't about me or what I am, you have a false model of reality.

> Running very large models on Mac is unusable at 10 tok/sec.

There are plenty of examples of models running at well over 10 tok/sec that aren't viable on the 3090. In fact such examples are found in the review in the OP. Did you not read the article?

I think you're projecting pretty hard with the two options you've listed. Go touch some grass, you seem overly frustrated that reality doesn't meet your expectations.

Since you clearly don't use local llms, allow me to educate you - anything under 100 tok/sec is USELESS. When you are coding, the idea is that you want to have a system that can generate files fast, hopefully correct on the first try. Cloud models do this. Local models, by nature of having less parameters and more quantization, often require more guidance and repeated inference to get it right. The antigenic harnesses that people set up around local llms leverage this.

Looking at the article, which you clearly didn't read,the m5 ultra runs Qwen3.8, which fits on one GPU conveniently, at ~20 tok/sec. This is a fucking joke. It will take roughly a minute to generate one code file. Congrats if you want privacy I guess, but for straight up coding, you are better just using cloud models.

Meanwhile, I have an $800 mini PC, $200 Occulink gpu dock, a $2000 3090 and a $300 power supply, and I can run Qwen at over 100 tok/sec prefill, not to mention insanely quicker during inference. So its pointless to spend Mac M5 Ultra prices on Apple shit when they can have something much faster for cheaper

The whole thing of "well I can run bigger models that don't fit on a GPU" is either paid Apple advertising, or you are just an igorant fanboy.

So I ask you again, which one are you?

  • > allow me to educate you

    No thanks, you're not in a position to do that clearly.

    > Since you clearly don't use local llms

    I do, probably a lot longer than you have actually.

    > anything under 100 tok/sec is USELESS

    Objectively wrong. You sound like you're really behind and you're so myopic that you think coding is the only use case for local LLMs. I'm a professional software dev and that's the least interesting use case of local LLMs.

    > Looking at the article, which you clearly didn't read,the m5 ultra runs Qwen3.8, which fits on one GPU conveniently, at ~20 tok/sec.

    You clearly didn't read the article or have reading comprehension issues. The model is Qwen3.8-Flash-Next 4 and 5-bit quant, neither of which "conveniently fits on one GPU". Sorry that your hardware doesn't live up to your own delusions and can't even run Qwen3.8-Flash-Next at 4/5 bit quant. You are taking the Quen3.8-27B numbers, something that the article isn't really that concerned with, and trying to make it fit into your narrative.

    > So I ask you again, which one are you?

    Well I'm someone that suggests that you should touch some grass and reevaluate your personal issues. You seem angry. Perhaps it's best to figure your own issues before trying to figure out why people are excited about Apple hardware for local llms. I am sure the people that need to interact with you in society would be very grateful if you took the time to do this.