← Back to context Comment by Sharlin 7 hours ago Uh, no. If stage X is the bottleneck, it's immaterial how much you speed up stage Y. 3 comments Sharlin Reply shykes 7 hours ago You're assuming QA reviews won't be fully automated, and triggered from a CI pipeline. bluGill 3 hours ago QA is not automatable. QA is about finding the things that you didn't think of and so didn't write a test for it. That many people think qa is not important shows in the bad software we have. oblio 7 hours ago We can assume lots of things, but at some point the rubber must hit the road.What exactly are you using to back up this claim?> QA reviews [...] fully automated
shykes 7 hours ago You're assuming QA reviews won't be fully automated, and triggered from a CI pipeline. bluGill 3 hours ago QA is not automatable. QA is about finding the things that you didn't think of and so didn't write a test for it. That many people think qa is not important shows in the bad software we have. oblio 7 hours ago We can assume lots of things, but at some point the rubber must hit the road.What exactly are you using to back up this claim?> QA reviews [...] fully automated
bluGill 3 hours ago QA is not automatable. QA is about finding the things that you didn't think of and so didn't write a test for it. That many people think qa is not important shows in the bad software we have.
oblio 7 hours ago We can assume lots of things, but at some point the rubber must hit the road.What exactly are you using to back up this claim?> QA reviews [...] fully automated
You're assuming QA reviews won't be fully automated, and triggered from a CI pipeline.
QA is not automatable. QA is about finding the things that you didn't think of and so didn't write a test for it. That many people think qa is not important shows in the bad software we have.
We can assume lots of things, but at some point the rubber must hit the road.
What exactly are you using to back up this claim?
> QA reviews [...] fully automated