← Back to context

Comment by lelanthran

6 hours ago

> But the problem is that the AI buildout has become a large percentage of GDP. So obviously the government wants to keep it going because these companies are pumping enormous amounts of money into the economy.

They are pumping enormous amounts of money into each other. Hardly any of that is making its way to people, it's all going to highly automated construction and to energy use.

Seriously, how many jobs did the $1t in venture capital fund?

If I pay you 100$ for mowing my lawn, and you me for yours. Technically the GDP increased with 200$.

  • And, in this case, the dollar-amount increase in GDP serves as a virtual quantitative proxy for the increase in mowed lawns (and the value thereof). In other words, the participants in this economy are collectively ~$200 richer with their mowed lawns than they were without them.

    • This is a thinly disguised broken window parable.

      If everyone goes around mowing lawns for each other, the economy is richer in lawn mowing at the expense of all the other things that would have been funded had everyone mowed their own lawns and purchased different services instead.

      3 replies →

    • If the pricing is fair and at arms' length. What's happening in reality is as if they are mowing each others' lawns at wink wink nudge nudge $1000. Not a good proxy for actual value created.

      1 reply →

    • But also importantly the government of the residents' country is about 39% ($78) richer, if say the participants are honest in reporting this and the country is the UK and the participants are people like you and me in the tech industry who frequent HN and would think to do something like this.

  • How about I draw you a picture instead. Mowing a lawn is a priceable service.

> Hardly any of that is making its way to people, it's all going to highly automated construction and to energy use.

How do we know that? How automated is the construction really?

In any case, the Fed and other central banks can print as much money as they want in order to hit any aggregate spending or inflation target they have for the economy.