Comment by awad
5 hours ago
Why is it OK to train on the collective IP of humanity and call it fair use but then call the next batch distilled with negative connotations?
5 hours ago
Why is it OK to train on the collective IP of humanity and call it fair use but then call the next batch distilled with negative connotations?
I did no such moral claim. I just noted that the foundation labs are working on technical hurdles to thwart distillation efforts and the cost and quality of Chinese models isn’t likely to keep up with the 6 month lag time everyone has assumed.
This is why Imaginary Property is an illusion, as everything is a derivative work, and AI is going to make that fact even clearer.
That's not true for literally everything.
When eg I snap a picture of my dog, that's not derived from anything. But I still get intellectual property rights for the photograph.
I don’t follow. Fair use is a copyright defense, and nobody is suggesting distillation attacks are just a copyright violation are they?
Aren’t they alleging these other companies directly entered into a contract and violated the terms, and in cases where question, answer pairs were obtained without such agreement, it was accomplished by outright wire fraud or theft?
Are you suggesting that worldwide copyright violation is more acceptable than contract breach between companies?
[dead]