← Back to context

Comment by relevant_stats

6 days ago

> Ironic, isn't it? Yet you continue your lackluster form devoid any criticism of ideas.

Pointing out someone's contradiction is now being 'critical of form'? And someone's contradicting themselves is 'ironic'?

Now I'm not even sure you know the meaning of words you use. EOT from me.

Your claim that suspected AI assistance proves the author isn't interested -- and therefore that the work is probably superficial -- is unsupported.